Gift Cards

POV FOODS ––– Local Places. Happy Faces.™


    11 AM – 8 PM



We successfully own and operate several sober living homes in Texas and Colorado that are adequately serving the needs of men and women who are recovering from addiction. Although SLHs have existed for decades, research on them continues to be limited. Part of the problem is that SLHs emerged as a grass roots movement of persons in recovery rather than an intervention introduced by academics or researchers. There were therefore few proponents of SLHs who were well positioned to scientifically investigate outcomes or disseminate the strengths of the intervention in publications (Polcin & Borkman, 2008).

What is a dry house?

What is a dry house? Wikipedia defines dry houses as: “an institute for people with criminal backgrounds or substance use disorder problems to learn (or relearn) the necessary skills to re-integrate into society and better support and care for themselves.”

This is an added benefit in that it will help you keep up with these obligations and stay in a sober state-of-mind. States that regulate these facilities require a maximum number of residents, often fewer than 10. These facilities are houses located in quiet neighborhoods, although they may sometimes be in apartment buildings. Cost largely depends on the mortgage for the home and the average rent in the area. Renting a room in a sober living home is similar to renting an apartment, but with more community involvement.

What kind of rules are in place at sober living homes?

Or, perhaps you have been through rehab before and relapsed shortly after returning home because your family members continued to use alcohol or drugs around you. So you learned that you need more time after leaving rehab to work on resistance skills and believe that a sober living home can give you the benefit of several months in a drug-free environment with peer support. Claims are often made that requiring state licensing or certification will help guarantee that sober housing is operated appropriately. The social model approach rejects this claim on practical and theoretical grounds in favor of peer-based monitoring systems in which sober houses supervise each other. Both CAARR and SLN work on this latter basis, but this approach has not been formally studied and self-monitoring standards have not been reviewed or critiqued by researchers or other parties who could provide balance and perspective. Some SLHs had a system where day-to-day oversight of the house was provided by residents themselves through a democratically elected resident council.

The coffee pot symbolizes a welcoming place that encourages people to enter and engage in a variety of recovery-conducive activities (Borkman, 1990). The design of the setting emphasized warmth, informality, easy access, and no hierarchical spaces that would separate staff from participants or to create different classes of participants. A variety of activities and AA meetings were offered, as well as connections to AA meetings held at off-site locations. Heavy emphasis was placed on voluntary participation and volunteer activity to supplement work by a few paid staff. Staff of the NRC required special training and personal skills to create an orderly and welcoming facility under these conditions(Shaw, 1990).

How Long Can You Stay in a Sober-Living House?

Many of these suggestions are consistent with suggestions made in a recent report on residential recovery settings published by the National Association of Recovery Residences (2012), a group that combines sober housing practitioners, researchers, and officials. Interest in community-based recovery services more broadly conceived has increased among national organizations including the National Association of Recovery Residences (NARR) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). NARR was only recently formed and has developed new standards for recovery homes of all types. They are active in promoting expansion of community based recovery and additional research to document outcomes.

sober living house

The goal was for staff, most themselves in recovery, to link clients to medical, social, housing and AA-oriented recovery services that would initiate longer-term recovery. Detoxification alone without engagement in additional services that helped maintain abstinence was viewed as unacceptable. Operators of this social-model detoxification programs found that only about 5 percent of public inebriates coming through their doors required immediate medical treatment. An analysis of the socio-physical design of the setting provided a model and a guideline for replication of architectural design and physical features of the social model detox setting (Wittman et al., 1976). A differs from a halfway house in that the individuals who reside in these facilities mostly come directly from inpatient substance use treatment programs.